Subsidence, settlement and heave

An old insurance letter records a cash settlement and the crack is still open. Has anyone checked that repairs were part of that settlement?

No. Nobody on this visit checked that repairs were part of that cash settlement. An old insurance letter records a cash settlement and the crack is still open, so money was paid at some point and the damage is still visible. A cash settlement can be paid instead of the insurer doing the repairs, which means the crack may never have been stitched or pointed afterwards. The survey saw the letter and the open crack. It has not audited the claim file and has not decided that the settlement included completed repairs.

Last reviewed 24 October 2026. Written for buyers in England and Wales unless this answer says otherwise. No named surveyor has signed this page. It is general guidance, not a report on your house, and not legal advice.

What is the fuller explanation?

Insurance files hold the scope of what was paid for. A single letter that mentions a cash settlement does not itemise stitch bars, resin, or a monitored close-out. The open crack is physical evidence that, whatever was paid, a visible break remains. The surveyor is not the insurer and did not reconstruct the claim. Dates, sums and the identity of any contractor were not established beyond the letter itself. The gap is whether repair was even in the bargain, not a verdict on how well an unseen repair was done.

Ask your solicitor to obtain the fuller claim papers if they exist, and to keep them separate from this survey. Tell a lender or a new insurer that a cash settlement is recorded and the crack is still open, so completed repairs have not been shown. Do not describe the wall as previously put right. The letter is a payment note. The crack is still there. The link between them was not checked.

What should you ask your surveyor?

  • Has anyone checked that repairs were included in the cash settlement?
  • Is the claim file in the survey, or only an old letter?
  • Does the open crack contradict a story that repairs were finished?

What are the typical next steps?

  1. Treat completed repairs as not shown.
  2. Ask the solicitor for the fuller claim papers if they exist.
  3. Do not describe the wall as previously put right.

Costs vary with the building and with who you instruct. Where this page does not cite a published figure, ask the surveyor, a relevant specialist, or your solicitor for a written quote. Do not treat a forum average as the price.

Also asked about this

Does an open crack prove the settlement was never spent on the wall?

It proves the crack is still open. It does not prove what the money was for, or that nothing was done nearby. The survey has not audited the settlement. Some work could have happened and left this crack, or none. That is why the question stays open. Do not invent the missing scope.

Can the same insurer be assumed to cover the crack now?

No. The survey has not read a current policy and has not decided that anyone is still on risk. An old letter is history. Cover now is a question for the insurer and your solicitor. Do not tell a lender the crack is already within a live claim. This visit did not open one.

Sources